“Liquidity is there when you need it—until you don’t.” — Warren Buffett

How ETF Liquidity Actually Works (And Why Most People Misunderstand It)

Liquidity is one of the most cited — and least understood — characteristics of exchange-traded funds. Investors are often told to “check the volume” or to avoid ETFs that “don’t trade much,” as if ETF liquidity worked the same way as stock liquidity.

It doesn’t.

This misunderstanding leads to unnecessary anxiety, poor fund comparisons, and in some cases, avoiding perfectly suitable ETFs for the wrong reasons. It also distracts investors from the factors that actually matter over long holding periods.

This article explains how ETF liquidity really works, why common shortcuts fail, and how to think about liquidity in a way that supports calm, disciplined decision-making.

Early on, this fits naturally within the broader framework laid out in
[Internal link: The Complete Guide to ETF Investing: Building Wealth Without Stock Picking].

What Investors Usually Mean by “Liquidity”

When most investors talk about liquidity, they are asking a practical question:

If I want to sell, can I do it easily and at a fair price?

For individual stocks, this question maps reasonably well to visible metrics like trading volume and bid-ask spreads. Stocks trade based on supply and demand between buyers and sellers of that single security.

ETFs are different.

An ETF is not a standalone asset. It is a wrapper around a portfolio of underlying securities. As a result, ETF liquidity operates on two levels, not one.

Confusing these two levels is where most misunderstandings begin.

The Two Layers of ETF Liquidity

1. Trading Liquidity (The Secondary Market)

This is the liquidity most investors see on their screen.

It includes:

• Daily trading volume

• Bid-ask spreads

• Order book depth

This is the market where investors trade ETF shares with other investors during the day.

Low trading volume here often triggers concern. The assumption is that fewer trades mean fewer buyers, and therefore higher risk of being “stuck.”

That assumption is incomplete.

2. Underlying Asset Liquidity (The Primary Market)

The second layer — and the more important one — is the liquidity of the assets inside the ETF.

This includes:

• The stocks or bonds the ETF holds

• The depth and activity of those underlying markets

• The ability to create or redeem ETF shares as needed

This layer determines how much liquidity the ETF can ultimately access, even if visible trading activity is low.

An ETF holding large-cap U.S. equities does not suddenly become illiquid because only a few thousand shares trade per day. The liquidity exists in the underlying market, not just in the ETF wrapper.

The Creation and Redemption Mechanism

The key structural feature that separates ETFs from stocks is the creation and redemption process.

ETF shares are not fixed in supply.

When demand for an ETF increases, new shares can be created. When demand falls, shares can be redeemed and removed from circulation. This process is handled by institutional participants known as authorized participants (APs).

At a high level:

• APs deliver a basket of underlying securities to the ETF provider

• In exchange, they receive newly created ETF shares

• Or they reverse the process during redemptions

This mechanism allows ETF supply to expand and contract as needed.

The result is that ETF liquidity is not limited by how many shares happen to be trading at a given moment. It is anchored to the liquidity of the underlying assets.

This is why ETF volume alone is a poor proxy for liquidity.

The Role of Market Makers

Market makers sit between buyers and sellers, providing continuous quotes throughout the trading day.

Their job is not to speculate on ETF prices. It is to facilitate trading while managing risk.

Market makers:

• Quote bid and ask prices

• Hedge exposure using the underlying securities

• Adjust spreads based on volatility and market conditions

When markets are calm, spreads tend to be narrow. When volatility increases, spreads widen. This is not a sign that ETFs are malfunctioning. It is a reflection of higher risk in the underlying market.

Importantly, market makers rely on the creation and redemption mechanism. They are not limited to existing ETF shares when managing inventory.

Why Low Trading Volume Is Often Misinterpreted

A common belief is that ETFs with low daily volume are inherently risky or difficult to trade.

In practice, low visible volume often means one of three things:

• The ETF is held by long-term investors who trade infrequently

• The ETF is newer but holds highly liquid securities

• The ETF serves a narrow allocation role rather than a trading function

None of these automatically imply poor liquidity.

An ETF holding liquid underlying assets can accommodate large trades even if average daily volume appears modest. In such cases, volume reflects investor behavior, not structural weakness.

This distinction matters most for long-term investors, who are typically trading infrequently and in modest size relative to institutional flows.

When ETF Liquidity Actually Matters

Liquidity is not irrelevant. It is just frequently misapplied.

It tends to matter more in the following situations:

Thin or Specialized Underlying Markets

ETFs holding:

• High-yield bonds

• Bank loans

• Frontier market equities

• Niche commodity instruments

In these cases, the underlying assets themselves may trade infrequently or with wider spreads. ETF liquidity cannot exceed the liquidity of what the fund owns.

Large Trades Relative to Fund Size

Executing trades that represent a significant percentage of an ETF’s assets under management can create temporary price impact, particularly outside normal market hours.

Periods of Market Stress

During volatile markets, bid-ask spreads can widen and pricing may temporarily deviate from estimates of net asset value. This reflects stress in the underlying markets, not a unique ETF flaw.

For most long-term investors making periodic contributions or rebalancing trades, these scenarios are rare.

Common Liquidity Myths, Addressed Directly

“ETFs Can Trap Investors”

ETFs trade throughout the day and can be sold whenever markets are open. Liquidity constraints come from the underlying markets, not from the ETF structure itself.

“High Volume ETFs Are Always Safer”

High volume often correlates with popularity, not necessarily suitability. A popular ETF can still be poorly aligned with an investor’s goals.

“ETFs Always Trade at Fair Value”

ETFs generally trade close to the value of their underlying assets, but small deviations can occur — especially during volatile periods. Understanding why matters more than assuming perfection.

Related concepts like spreads and tracking behavior are explored further in
[Internal link: ETF Bid-Ask Spreads Explained]
and
[Internal link: ETF Tracking Error: What Actually Causes It].

Evaluating ETF Liquidity Rationally

A more disciplined approach focuses on structure rather than surface metrics.

Key considerations include:

• What does the ETF actually hold?

• How liquid are those underlying markets?

• How wide are typical bid-ask spreads during normal conditions?

• How frequently do you expect to trade?

For investors with long time horizons, liquidity concerns are often secondary to costs, diversification, and behavioral discipline.

This aligns with a broader principle explored elsewhere:
[Internal link: Asset Allocation Matters More Than Asset Selection].

Liquidity vs. Investor Behavior

Many liquidity fears are behavioral rather than structural.

Visible volume feels concrete. Structure feels abstract. As a result, investors overweight what they can easily observe and underweight what actually governs outcomes.

This can lead to:

• Avoiding suitable ETFs due to low visible volume

• Overpaying for popular funds with higher costs

• Making unnecessary changes during volatile markets

Understanding liquidity mechanics reduces the urge to react to noise.

Conclusion: Liquidity Is a Property of Structure, Not Headlines

ETF liquidity is not determined by how often shares trade on a screen. It is determined by what the ETF owns and how the structure connects investors to underlying markets.

For most long-term investors:

• Liquidity risk is often overstated

• Volume is frequently misunderstood

• Structural understanding matters more than surface indicators

The goal is not to optimize every trade. It is to make proportionate decisions, grounded in how ETFs actually function.

A clear understanding of liquidity supports patience, reduces unnecessary concern, and reinforces disciplined investing behavior.

For readers who want to deepen their understanding further, continuing through the broader ETF framework can help place liquidity alongside costs, diversification, and long-term strategy — where it belongs.

Related Stories